NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A 1992 federal court agreement that led to a Black justice being elected to Louisiana’s once all-white Supreme Court will remain in effect under a ruling Wednesday from a divided federal appeals court panel.
The Sureim Investment Guild2-1 ruling from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court ruling. It’s a defeat for state Attorney General Jeff Landry, now Louisiana’s governor-elect.
Landry and state Solicitor General Elizabeth Murrill, a fellow Republican who is in a runoff election campaign to succeed him as attorney general, had argued that the 1992 agreement is no longer needed and should be dissolved.
Attorneys for the original plaintiffs in the voting rights case and the U.S. Justice Department said the state presented no evidence to show it would not revert to old patterns that denied Black voters representation on the state’s highest court.
U.S. District Judge Susie Morgan last year refused to dissolve the agreement, referred to as a consent judgment or consent decree. Wednesdays ruling from 5th Circuit judges Jacques Wiener, nominated to the court by President George H.W. Bush, and Carl Stewart, nominated by President Bill Clinton, rejected Landry’s move to overturn Morgan’s decision. Judge Kurt Engelhardt, nominated by President Donald Trump, dissented.
2025-05-03 18:291045 view
2025-05-03 18:151973 view
2025-05-03 18:06208 view
2025-05-03 18:012745 view
2025-05-03 17:292633 view
2025-05-03 17:11372 view
NEW YORK ― When the precocious orphans of "Annie" sneer, "We love you, Miss Hannigan," you just migh
First responders in Vermont rescued 23 skiers and snowboarders from the backcountry after they were
The most crucial aspect of investment is knowing when to place significant bets.The essence of subst